Portland: Painting or Paving?

In a general sort of way I learn that Portland is planning to spend $613 million on bicycling over the next 20 years. Details are few, the picture uninspiring.

Hopefully, some bike paths will be built, and doing some painting of lanes is probably a good idea. But my idea of making bicycle commuting more attractive is simple- make sure the riders are not run over by cars when they use their legal half lane on any street, and give them someplace to shower and change clothes after their ride to work.

This, obviously, is a little harder to accomplish than just sending out the painting crews you already have to paint some more. But it also has the potential to unlock the powers of the individual cyclist and use all of the streets we already own.

And how hard would it really be? Build a shower and locker room each year in some major institution. Spend a million a year paying police officers to ride around on bicycles ticketing rude drivers (and get the benefits of more police monitoring the streets from eye level).

Or- perhaps the most direct approach- simply dictate that everyone employed in the Portland projects ride a bicycle to work.

Because it’s hard to escape the impression that Portland could spend $613 million and most of it could go to people who drove to work- and try as they might, people who drive to work are not really going to be understanding the problem. And in a very basic sense, we can’t build a whole new street system for bicyclists. About 20% (or more!) of the city is now street, and that’s a significant cut of the tax base. It’s not a liability we can duplicate, and not an asset we can waste. Put some kind of cap on how much of the money is going to be used for painted lanes, pamphlets, and classes on safe bicycling. And make sure you spend part of the money on something that actually makes a difference for an actual rider. Is that too much to ask?

red tube x videos x hamster

How Many Lanes on 23rd Ave?

Central District News reports that a study is underway to reduce 23rd Ave from 4 lanes to 2 and allow parking at certain times of day.

I don’t much care for this idea. I find the design pattern of “sometimes this is a travel lane, sometimes it’s a parking spot” to be maddening as a driver. The city uses it along NE 50th St. in Wallingford and parts of Aurora Ave north of 73rd St, among other places. It’s confusing.

I do support reducing the number of lanes on the street, preferably to one travel lane in each direction plus a center turn lane. Similar N-S streets in the area with similar traffic volumes (Broadway, 12th Ave, MLK Jr. Way) get by with this 3-lane approach.

As Dan @ hugeasscity wrote a while back, 23rd is just too darn narrow for its current configuration:

The root problem is simple: the 23rd Ave right of way (ROW) is too narrow, and it should never have been made into a four lane arterial. The ROW on this section of 23rd Ave is only 60 feet, which, with four 12-foot travel lanes, leaves only six feet for sidewalk on each side. There’s no room for a planting strip, and if a tree is put in, it ends up blocking half the sidewalk.

For comparison, even the side streets such as Marion have a wider ROW at 65 feet, with eight feet of planting strip between the sidewalk and the curb. Martin Luther King Way is 85 feet wide, and has only two travel lanes.

23rd Avenue has gotten so bad it needs to be completely blown up and rebuilt. Why not think differently this time around?

red tube x videos x hamster

Vessel Watch

Nice new feature from WSDOT. A live interactive map of the ferries. It’s not quite clear from the map, but it looks as if a red dot means the ferry is docked and a green icon means it’s in motion.

(via)

red tube x videos x hamster

Fun With Sub-Area Equity

One neighborhood in the Puget Sound is eager to get light rail. Another neighborhood is trying to find ways to keep it out.

Guess which neighborhood is actually getting light rail?

(via)

red tube x videos x hamster

The Winter of Our Discontent….

…or, the years the locusts ate. The outline of the future is now reasonably clear- in order
to keep a liveable climate, humanity will live in buildings on transit lines, and this society
has to be built in the next 20 years. You can stop thinking about the next car you’re going
to buy.

Some readers may disagree with this assessment, which springs in part from already
having seen one such tectonic shift in society and the environment. It may seem almost
inconceiveable that the foods we eat today might disappear, that the plants and animals
around us may disappear, and that we will be living in a social environment, often many
stories above the earth, almost unknown to us today.

Fortunately, we do not need to take sides, or act as advocates- at least, not yet. Only
events can move the vast mass of public opinion needed to effect change in America, and
only time is needed to bring those events to pass. In fact, considering the quality of
leadership in the Seattle Mayor’s office today, this would be a good time to go slowly and
check all the calculations twice.

In the meantime, enjoy it while it lasts. In 30 years you’re going to be remembering
wistfully the sights you see today. Pause to admire and engrave on your memory these
sights.

red tube x videos x hamster

WSDOT logic

We all know WSDOT loves cars, but this is just sad.

  1. Go to the WSDOT home page to see their list of priorities, click on “Climate Change.”
  2. Look for their “Climate Change Tools,” click on “Moving Washington.”
  3. Notice first that this page is aimed at reducing congestion.  Then notice that their first strategy is to add capacity*.

So according to WSDOT, more capacity = climate change tool.  Which is absolutely true – adding road capacity is one tool to change the climate.  I just don’t think that changing the climate should be one of our goals.

* I recognize that they actually say “add capacity strategically”, which is defined elsewhere as freeing up bottlenecks.  But that’s beside the point.  Freeing up bottlenecks will reduce traffic, encouraging people to live further from their jobs.  Implying otherwise is blatant greenwashing.

[update]

Cool.  Someone from WSDOT must read this blog.  Some time between yesterday and today they’ve changed their website to remove the “Moving Washington” link from their climate change page.  They are still greenwashing road building, they’re just hiding it.

Compare the current page to the older page (thanks Google archive).  Strangely, they also removed their goals for reducing VMT by 50% in the next 40 years.

red tube x videos x hamster

Seattle should be the first carbon neutral city.

KUOW* recently played one of Alex Steffen’s Town Hall talks from a few months ago, and I highly recommend listening to them.  He claims that Seattle has a world reputation as a green city, which is based purely on our clean hydroelectric energy source, not the way we run our city or region.  But we could use this free marketing with our geographic luck and some hard work to convert our city to the world’s first that is carbon neutral – setting an example for other cities to follow.

Our luck extends beyond geography.  It turns out that our own Bill Gates has announced that he will use his foundation to try to get the entire world on track to be carbon neutral.  Perhaps we can convince our politicians, businesses, and citizens to get on board as well.

* if you listen to podcasts I highly recommend adding Speakers’ Forum to your list.  It’s a weekly broadcast of speakers from a wide range of subjects at local venues.

red tube x videos x hamster

A Brief History of Recent Seattle Broadband Efforts

This is a bit off-topic for this blog, but it’s infrastructure related, so why not?

The Mayor’s office recently announced its intent to respond to a Request for Information (RFI) from Google to provide high-speed broadband to the city. This isn’t the first time a Seattle Mayor had a plan for city-wide broadband.

In 2004, then-Mayor Nickels created a Broadband Task Force to study some options. The task force’s report (pdf) recommended “citywide broadband service by 2015.” It also suggested the following:

Evaluate broadband technologies that might be used in a public network, especially FTTP, the bypass strategy, and use of wireless “last mile” as an interim step. An interim solution might produce revenue for the City, increase competition, demonstrate the City’s commitment to meeting its broadband goal, and serve as a first step towards an eventual FTTP build-out.

FTTP, or fiber-to-the-premises, is exactly what Google’s talking about building.

So what happened to the task force? In 2006, the task force released its own RFI, to determine if there were any private companies interested in building out such a network. After that, there was some push-back from the big telecom companies. From what I was able to uncover, a formal RFP was never issued, or was issued and never responded to.

Meanwhile, Seattle’s CTO Bill Schrier discussed an RFP in 2008, and has been quite vocal on his blog about the need to upgrade the city’s network. He and McGinn seem to see eye-to-eye on the need for high-speed broadband and it was part of McGinn’s campaign agenda.

So progress is happening, albeit slowly. In that regard, it’s important to see the Google effort as just one small piece of a larger agenda. Whatever happens with Google — and there are plenty of cities vying for the same pool of money — we shouldn’t let it distract us from the ultimate goal of city-wide FTTP broadband.

Last year, blogger Matt Yglesias took a look at the disparity in broadband speed among developed nations and concluded, “the high-performing countries are generally places where electronics manufacturers have more political clout than telecom firms and thus are able to force implementation of these open access policies. ”

In other words, if your country is home to companies like Nokia and Samsung that want to sell lots of shiny, net-enabled gadgets, you’re more likely to have cheap broadband.

Perhaps the rise of companies like Apple and Google (not to mention Microsoft), who benefit from cheap, ubiquitous high-speed broadband, along with a President who’s committed to a national broadband agenda, will finally be enough to turn the tide.

red tube x videos x hamster

April Fools Suggestions

It occurred to me that the electronic signs in Link’s windows telling you their destination are almost useless, since we currently only have one line.  Also, the electronic signs announcing departing trains will be a bit sad, with only one destination announced per direction.  I therefore suggest the following use, for one day humor value:

1. Change train signs to destinations in other cities.  Since everyone in Seattle seems to come from California, I think something along the line of “N Judah” or “Pittsburgh / Bay Point” might be sufficiently disorienting.

2. Why limit the electronic signs to announcing the soonest trains to depart?  I’m picturing:

  • Westlake Center: 2 minutes
  • Westlake Center: 8 minutes
  • University District: 6 years
  • Overlake Transit Center: 20 years
red tube x videos x hamster

Stabbing Prohibited

I love the stickers someone placed on Metro buses. Stabbing Prohibited and No Urinating.  This should remove a few common bus faux pas.

red tube x videos x hamster