zipcar

Construction Costs

For a while there, the construction costs were rising at 10% to 15% annually. This was making infrastructure projects incredibly expensive. Competition for cement and construction workers were among the factors driving these cost increases. Sound Transit got one lousy bidder for SeaTac station, and the bid was double their budget! Construction companies had too much work on their hands to bother.

But with the bursting of the housing bubble and the overall slowing of the economy, infrastructure projects should become less expensive. Also, the cost of acquiring land will likely go down. California is set to spend $3 to $4 Billion just buying land for their high speed rail link. How much would that land have cost if it were purchased two years ago, at the height of the California housing bubble?

Point being, these costs should subside in the coming years. Of course, they’re subsiding because the economy is cooling overall, meaning that tax revenues are going to go down. Will Sound Transit suffer a revenue shortfall because of this? Will the decrease in construction costs be more than enough to cancel it out? Hard to say. If anyone has answers to these questions, feel free to drop a line.

Sen. Cardin on Transit

This interview in Grist has been making the rounds:

[The transit portion called for] $171 billion over the life of the bill. That’s big money. That can make a major impact. It can make a huge difference in the capacity for transit programs. We are in desperate need of significant transit improvements. We’ve got to have the facilities and we don’t today, and then we need the fare-box and economic policies that reward people for taking public transportation. Some try to say that it should be “self-sufficient” or have a certain percentage return through the fare-box. We don’t do that on our roads, and public transportation is much better for so many reasons — not just the environment or the quality of life. We should be providing much stronger incentives for people to use public transportation, but first you need to have the facilities.

I’m a big, big supporter of dramatic change in public transportation. It includes more than just the bus and rail systems in our urban areas. It includes a commuter rail and inner-city rail — the whole gamut of services that get people out of their personal vehicles. I don’t want people driving their personal vehicles the way they are today.

54 senators signed on… not enough to bring it to a vote, of course, but with a few more Democrats in congress next year, it could be a reality.

Shanghai-Beijing Bullet Train

818 miles long, top speed of 217mph, and opening in 2013.

Remind me why we can’t do this in America?

Viaduct Accolades

Congratulations on the Alaskan Way Viaduct for being included in Popular Mechanics report, “The 10 Pieces of U.S. Infrastructure We Must Fix Now.”

Tunnelin' Jersey

There’s a great article in the New York Times about the second Hudson River tunnel connecting New Jersey to Manhattan, and contrasting the technology being used (our beloved Tunnel Boring Machines) with the way the first tunnels were constructed 100 years ago.

The article also touches on the complicated intermodal interplay involved in making such changes. Terminating a few dozen more trains per day on Manhattan’s West Side means more pressure on city streets and subway systems, which in turn leads to calls for building out the rest of the system. And then you have the whole congestion pricing scheme changing people’s incentives:

Keeping up means raising tolls and fares at New Jersey Transit, Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road as well as at the Port Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. In addition, Gov. Jon S. Corzine wants to raise highway tolls by as much as 800 percent. New York State is mulling a plan to charge drivers $8 to enter a zone south of 60th Street in Manhattan. Drivers entering the city from New Jersey would pay an extra $3 or $4, something Mr. Corzine opposes.

Also check out the interactive feature if you really want to get your infrastructure geek on.

Infrastructure Costs

Nice article by Seattle NYT correspondent William Yardley on the increase in construction costs and how it’s affecting public projects around the country:

Costs have jumped for projects as varied as levee construction in New Orleans, Everglades restoration in Florida and huge sewer system upgrades in Atlanta. The reconstruction of the Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis, a $234 million project, has been fast-tracked for completion by December, and state officials say it is too soon to know whether it will come in on budget.

The impact has been felt in different regions at different times, and not every project has been high-profile. In Oregon, high costs have forced the State Department of Transportation to slow the rate at which it upgrades roads and bridges. In Seattle, school building projects were put on a fast track this fall because of fears of cost overruns.

The article focuses on the increase in costs of bulding materials and labor, due to a global construction boom. I have to wonder how much the falling dollar also plays into the equation.

How it's Done

British Columbia knows how to make investments in infrastructure:

[T]he plan will likely see significant investment in rapid transit and dedicated bus lanes, such as the ones proposed for the centre of Douglas Street. On the Lower Mainland, it will likely see funding and a final route plan for the Evergreen SkyTrain Line to the northeast suburbs, rapid transit to the Fraser Valley, and the Millennium Line extension in Vancouver to the University of B.C., according to Global BC. It’s not known if the rapid transit plans will include the Island – transit advocates have long been pulling for light rail to connect downtown Victoria with the rapidly growing West Shore.

In December, Finance Minister Carole Taylor predicted B.C. will have a surplus of $2.1 billion for the 2007-08 fiscal year. She has remained quiet on what will be in her budget due out Feb. 19, though last week spoke about the possibility of a provincial carbon tax or a levy at the gas pumps.

It sure is nice that the province is willing to fund Vancouver’s SkyTrain. Meanwhile, here in Washington, The legislature is convening today to… hide the budget surplus in a sock drawer or something.

A Different Take

Knute Berger, ever the contrarian, has a weekend essay in Crosscut arguing that, hey, we’re actually moving forward on this whole infrastructure-upgrade-thing that blogs like this one have been so obsessed with, so, you know… let’s give ourselves some credit.

And he’s right. We are moving forward, and that’s one reason why I wanted to start this website. There’s just so much going on to talk about and document.

Anyway, the article’s alright, but you should definitely take the time to scroll down through the comments, where Berger and R&T proponent Sandeep Kaushik get into it over Ron Sims, congestion pricing, and more. I’d give a link, but Crosscut‘s funky content management system doesn’t seem to provide permalinks to comments.

Almost Casually, the Swiss Build on a Scale of Which Modern Americans Can Only Dream

NYT with a great little piece on a 22-mile rail tunnel recently opened in the Swiss Alps.

… the Lötschberg tunnel is only part of an ambitious program to protect the Alps, a Swiss national heritage, from environmental damage.

The environmental problem arises because the Alps lie right between two of Europe’s most dynamic economic regions, northern Italy and southern Germany, which have threatened to overwhelm the mountains with truck traffic. So more than a decade ago, the Swiss voted to impose steep tariffs on trucks passing through their country. They also voted to ban the construction of four-lane highways in the Alps.

By last year Switzerland had collected more than $1.1 billion in tolls. The money has been used to improve older tunnels and build new ones to put freight on rails, either directly or by putting truck trailers onto flatbed rail cars.

But when the Swiss go, they go first class. When the tunnel is fully operational in December, it will accommodate not just 70 freight trains a day, but as many as 30 passenger trains, capable of going 120 miles per hour, cutting an hour off the trip from Basel, in northern Switzerland, to the south.

The Swiss are not finished, either. They are now busily digging an even more ambitious 35-mile tunnel under the St. Gotthard Pass to the east, to supplement two existing 19th-century tunnels, to be completed by 2016.

By 2009, the Swiss want to reduce the number of trucks that pass over the country’s north-south roads to 650,000 a year, from 1.4 million in 2000, which would continue a long decline in truck traffic. Since 1995, such traffic has swollen by 40 percent in the European Union, but has declined by 8 percent in Switzerland.

More and more I feel like Americans would do well to spend less time harrumphing about their mythical superiority in things like monster engineering projects, and more time learning about how they get things done these days in other parts of the developed world. Fact is there’s just nothing (maybe the Big Dig or the East Side Subway, but little else) going on in the US that even compares to the Swiss tunnel plan in its scope and ambition.