kingcounty

Smarter Highways

By Frank on October 22, 2009

Allow the fine folks at WSDOT to tell you about Active Traffic Management, which will keep you from being “exposed to the dangers of traffic”:

Pretty cool. I can’t wait to tell my grandkids that even in the early 21st century, the best way to find out which route to take in our car was to wait 10 minutes for the traffic report on the radio and pray that (a) they covered the highway you were on, and (b) the report came on while you still had the opportunity to turn.

More here.

Posted in

Almost a Done Deal

By bgtothen on December 11, 2008

I almost want to say Boo Ya but I won’t because there is one last alternative to the surface transit alternative. I really commend the state for throwing out all of the alternatives that should obviously not be advanced. Chopp’s alternative didn’t solve any problems (and just created more), and no matter how nice the tunnel sounds there simply is no money for it and if there is no money it will not happen. So the state made the hard choices and threw them out as it should have.

I would like to point out how the so called “grand compromise” was simply a political stunt by those that don’t want a surface alternative. They knew they had lost so they tried to circumvent the process at the last minute. The state rightly shut them down before they could even get momentum.

We should know what the governors choice is by the end of the year. I would be shocked if it isn’t the surface alternative. Now the major choices will be where transit money is spent and where is comes from.

Posted in , , , ,

Viaduct Proposal Visualizations

By bgtothen on November 13, 2008

WSDOT just uploaded images that show how each of the 8 alternatives will look in real life. First off I want to say how amazing these images are. WSDOT is trying very hard to make sure that the public understands how these alternatives will look.

Second look at alternatives A through C. Just imagine it! These alternatives will completely change downtown seattle. This street will be lined by cafes and restaurants that spill out into the sidewalk. It will be filled with Seattlites strolling and just enjoying themselves. We will wonder why we even contemplated keeping the viaduct. And look at this disaster. I would not want to be one of those people. They make alternative E look okay but I think the ends of the “integrated” structure will look awkward not to mention cutting off the rest of the city from the water. Lets not forget this is a freeway.

From a vehicle movement perspective alternative C is probably the best acceptable solution. I could do a calculation using the HCM to figure out the difference in vehicle throughput but I can’t find my copy of the HCM right now.

From an urban planning perspective A and B are the best alternatives. A is a low capital option of B which is good to consider, but alternative B is a knock out! Read the description.

“Scenario B is similar to Scenario A, but it has more capital investments and more aggressive transit improvements.

Alaskan Way would be two-lanes in each direction north of Yesler Way, with bike lanes and parking. There would be signalized intersections along the waterfront. The east/west streets north of the Battery Street Tunnel would be reconnected with new signalized intersections on Aurora Avenue.

In this scenario the streetcar system would be extended, with lines to Fremont/Ballard, University District, central downtown, and Capitol Hill/First Hill. The bus rapid transit system would be extended with lines for Delridge and Lake City Way and from Ballard to the University District. This service would be in addition to planned new lines serving Ballard, West Seattle and Aurora Avenue.

There would also be more extensive I-5 improvements than with Scenario A. An additional northbound lane on I-5 would start near Cherry Street and go north to SR 520.

This scenario would offer open space of 76-86 feet along the waterfront.”

The one down side of this alternative is that the pedestrian promenade along the water will be narrower and in alternative C. Maybe a hybrid of B and C could be used to increase the size of the promenade while maintaing the same vehicle throughput.

UPDATE
Daily transit trips to, from and within the city center will dramatically increase, from 196,000 to as many as 305,000 by 2015 if one surface option replaces the viaduct.

WOW!

Posted in , , , , ,

Driving Less

By Frank on August 18, 2008

WSDOT is fretting over the drop in traffic this year compared to last year. No kidding!

Fortunately for WSDOT, their own estimates show vehicle miles traveled inexplicably and mysteriously rising next year and going forward to 2040.

(via STB)

Posted in

VMT Declining

By Frank on July 28, 2008

Clark Williams-Derry notes that total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is declining nationwide. The US DOT frets that this will be the end of the highway trust fund, but I say, fear not! After all, WSDOT thinks that fuel economy will inexplicably rise starting next year. Maybe they should loan some of their analysts to the other Washington.

(yes, yes, per-capita VMT is not the same as total VMT.)

Posted in

VMT

By Frank on April 21, 2008

I’ve been remiss in not linking to Sightline’s widely-discussed report on gas consumption in the Northwest. The upshot is that gasoline consumption per capita in the Northwest declined 11% since 1999, despite the fact that it’s been holding steady nationwide.

Three factors are cited for the decline: increased fuel economy, increased transit ridership and the decrease in total vehicle miles traveled (VMT). What we don’t know is the relative impacts of these factors. For example, Sightline cites the fact that fuel economy increased 5% in just the last few years. And since fuel-efficient cars sell better in the Northwest than anywhere else in the country, we could chalk up a good chunk of the 11% decline to increased fuel economy. That’s all well and good for global warming, but it doesn’t make for a more transit-friendly region, just a more gas-friendly one.

Still, the increase in transit ridership and the decrease in per-capita VMT are great news for transit and density advocates and cannot be denied. Oddly, WSDOT’s VMT forecast, also used in the study, shows per-capita VMT declining between 2003 and FY 2008, but then inexplicably trending back up in the future. Check it out in chart form. Current data is in blue, projections for the future are in red:

vmt.png

You’d think with a Growth Management Act in place, gas topping $4/gallon and likely to increase, and a huge increase in transit investments, per-capita VMT would continue to decline. But WSDOT thinks the past four years are an abberation, and the figure is going to go back up. This doesn’t make sense to me. In fact, it reminds me of this chart (below) from Gen. Petraeus’ testimony before congress last week, showing U.S. expenditures in Iraq taking a whopping 90-degree turn. It doesn’t pass the straight face test, does it?

projector.png

Update: only a couple of hours after publishing this, I see that Clark Williams-Derry, the author of the report, has a strikingly similar post up at Sightline’s blog. His blog post is datelined Friday (in my RSS reader), but it didn’t show up in my RSS reader until 20 minutes ago for some unknown reason. Anyway, read his post because he has better data and prettier charts, which comes with being a full-time researcher instead of a lowly blogger. Still, it’s reassuring that even he doesn’t know what’s going on!

Posted in ,

Gettin’ HOT In Here

By Frank on April 6, 2008

HOT Lanes on SR 167 open April 26:

If the lanes are heavily congested, the toll could cost several dollars. But it could save drivers time they’d otherwise spend in more crowded general lanes. State officials think tolls in badly congested periods could rise to $4, though an electronic tracking system is set up to assess a maximum of $9.

Unlike the Narrows, there’ll be no tollbooths. Electronic scanners will note a HOT-lane user’s passage by reading a car-mounted transponder containing an electronic chip, and the system will deduct the charge from a prepaid account.

You can sign up for a transponder at the Good To Go site.

Posted in ,

Record Ridership on the Amtrak Cascades

By Frank on March 7, 2008

Big numbers:

Amtrak Cascades ridership in 2007 increased to 676,670–a 7.4 percent increase over 2006 and the highest annual ridership total since the inception of Amtrak Cascades service.

More convenient schedules and better connections, along with rising fuel prices for motorists influenced ridership growth. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) expects ridership to continue to increase with the extension of the current Portland-Seattle-Bellingham service to Vancouver, B.C in mid-2008.

Posted in ,

That Vision Thing

By Frank on February 6, 2008

David Ammonds, writing for the AP, ticks off some of the challenges facing David Moseley, the new Assistant Secretary for ferries at WSDOT:

He faces a mountain of problems, including an aging fleet, tight finances, cranky riders, occasional labor unrest, critical state audits and the ferry system’s reputation for being something of a rogue agency.

The question I have to ask, again, is why WSF, the “nation’s largest ferry system” has been allowed to become so unmoored (pun intended) from WSDOT. It says to me that WSDOT lacks a clear vision. Indeed, it is nearly impossible to find a mission or vision statement anywhere on WSDOT’s website. Compare that to Oregon DOT and CalTrans, where the mission, vision, and values are up there for all to see.

To be fair, I did finally stumble across the WSDOT vision. It was buried on page 6 of a PDF of a draft workforce assessment from 2006, which I found on page 4 of the results of a search on WSDOT’s own website for the phrase “mission statement.” Here it is:

Keep people and businesses moving by operating and improving the state’s transportation system which is vital to taxpayers and to communities.

It’s not horrible, but it’s pretty bad. Do communities not pay taxes? Why the need to call out taxpayers separately? It smacks of some last minute pander to anti-tax activists, and it’s not even a well-written sentence. Compare it, again, to ODOT:

To provide a safe, efficient transportation system that supports economic opportunity and livable communities for Oregonians.

Much better: safety, efficiency, economic opportunity, livability.

Now, you might say, “Frank, who gives a crap about this stuff? It’s just focus group consultant-babble b.s.” But this stuff matters. It’s important for an organization to have a vision, something to cohere around. Not just in the public sector, but in business as well. Ask Jack Welch.

Furthermore, down in Olympia this month we’re seriously considering building a whole new regional transit agency to take over where WSDOT has failed to deliver. Wouldn’t it behoove us to first consider why this happened, so the new RTC doesn’t suffer the same fate? Sure, I-695 sucked, and it’s clear the agency is still scrambling to replace the lost MVET funds. But maybe the fact that WSDOT has not had a clear vision for a multi-modal transportation system that truly improves the lives and opportunities of the citizens of the state is partly to blame as well.

On the bright side, the Governor seems to be (belatedly) coming around to this reality. Paula Hammond grasps the idea that WSF needs to be brought in closer to the rest of the agency. And Moseley seems to be well-respected as a manager.

In the meantime, WSDOT needs to align its mission and vision, and permeate that vision down the chain to all employees. Getting it up on the website might be a good first step.

Posted in ,

Snoqualmie Pass

By Frank on February 1, 2008

WSDOT’s Flickr page has lots of great photos of the snow-clearing efforts going on up at snoqualmie pass.

(via Seattlest, photo by WSDOT used under a Creative Commons license)

Posted in ,

Next »