<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle: Cheapest Dense City for Renters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orphanroad.com/blog/2010/01/seattle-cheapest-dense-city-for-renters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orphanroad.com/blog/2010/01/seattle-cheapest-dense-city-for-renters</link>
	<description>Puget Sound Transportation and Land Use Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle: Cheapest Dense City for Renters &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://www.orphanroad.com/blog/2010/01/seattle-cheapest-dense-city-for-renters/comment-page-1#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle: Cheapest Dense City for Renters &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orphanroad.com/?p=1922#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>[...] here to see the original: Seattle: Cheapest Dense City for Renters   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see the original: Seattle: Cheapest Dense City for Renters   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://www.orphanroad.com/blog/2010/01/seattle-cheapest-dense-city-for-renters/comment-page-1#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orphanroad.com/?p=1922#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! I wonder how it changes if you look at the most urban parts of the area. For example, in this recent post Patrick Kennedy calculates &quot;I am paying at least a 20% premium to live in a walkable/transit-friendly neighborhood&quot;:
http://carfreeinbigd.blogspot.com/2010/01/damn-theyre-saving-more-loot-than-me.html
(Of course, he still pocketed about $6600 by going without a car.)

I&#039;m pretty sure I saw that price premium when looking for a new place in the most walkable parts of Seattle last year. Renting in pretty much every urban village or center except Northgate was more expensive than renting in non-walkable areas. Hmm, come to think of it if I were investing in real estate right now (ha ha) I might look hard at Northgate. I bet people smarter than me have already thought of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! I wonder how it changes if you look at the most urban parts of the area. For example, in this recent post Patrick Kennedy calculates &#8220;I am paying at least a 20% premium to live in a walkable/transit-friendly neighborhood&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://carfreeinbigd.blogspot.com/2010/01/damn-theyre-saving-more-loot-than-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://carfreeinbigd.blogspot.com/2010/01/damn-theyre-saving-more-loot-than-me.html</a><br />
(Of course, he still pocketed about $6600 by going without a car.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I saw that price premium when looking for a new place in the most walkable parts of Seattle last year. Renting in pretty much every urban village or center except Northgate was more expensive than renting in non-walkable areas. Hmm, come to think of it if I were investing in real estate right now (ha ha) I might look hard at Northgate. I bet people smarter than me have already thought of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

