February 2009

You are browsing the archive for February 2009.

Reserving ROW With Zoning Powers

While visiting Spokane this weekend this story, City exerts zoning power in the Valley Voice caught my eye. The upshot is the City of Spokane Valley wants to set aside a 100′ wide corridor for future HCT. There’s an issue whether this is “taking” land without reimbursement or if as the city prefers to call it a setback. Apart from the legal issues which can be resolved this sort of planning for the future with respect to transit seems like a very wise idea.

One Bus Away Gets Press, But the Press Doesn't Get One Bus Away

Nice to see some good press for Brian Ferris’ excellent One Bus Away service, which we’ve discussed previously.  

The service has saved me plenty of headaches.  I’ve become so accustomed to it that I get annoyed with the lack of cell phone service in the Downtown Transit Tunnel.  I understand that it will only get better in the next year or so as Metro implements true GPS on all buses (the current system relies on the buses checking in with radio transponders at time points and then approximating their location based on the schedule).  

Here’s a question: why didn’t The Seattle Times or the Seattle P-I develop something like this?  The technology behind OBA has been around for a decade.  

I understand that bigshots like Frank Blethen might cruise to work in a Porsche SUV, and thus be oblivious to what’s going on on the city’s buses.  But maybe one of their bus-riding underlings should tell them that BlackBerrys, iPods and Kindles are starting to outnumber folded-up copies of the Times and the P-I on the morning commute.  Why not serve them up something useful, like some location-targeted advertising and a few headlines from today’s papers?  Or better yet, a few headlines from P-I bloggers or other local content from their neighborhood?

 

New Formulas

The stimulus being debated in Congress right now isn’t the be-all and end-all of the Democrats’ transportation plans.  The real stuff, as I’ve said before, will come with the reauth of the SAFETEA-LU act later this year.  The Transport Politic lays out what it might look like.  

The biggest deal here is a change in the cost-effectiveness metric used to award transit capital grants.  As I understand it (somebody I’m sure will correct me if I’m wrong), the current metric doesn’t account for things like transit oriented development or the other ways in which rail transit has been proven to bring in new riders. But that may change, and that would be huge.

Combine that with the Dodd-Hagel infrastructure bank and you’ve got the makings of a kick-ass federal transit development program.  

Our Civic Institution

Back in 1970 I voted against the proposed subway, because it was ‘a conspiracy to benefit the rich’ etc etc. Of course, in those days the Highway Department had quite literally and illegally conspired against the citizens to build freeways, city departments and unions conspired to give the shoreline away to businessmen, and, in violation of the Shoreline Management Act, Roanoke Reef was under construction with permits illegally issued by the Building Department.

As the years passed and government was cleaned up, conspiracy theories became more a general misguided do-goodism, occasionally whipped to a froth by demagogues like John Fox. The Sierra Club opposed rail transit because "it would encourage sprawl", and citizens voted a height limit on buildings for reasons I never understood.

Eventually the reaction to non-existent conspiracies reached a nadir when Seattle hipsters were led around by the ring in their nose by the unholy trinity of John Fox, a used car dealer, and a suburban chain of free ‘alternate’ newspapers opposing the Seattle Commons proposal. Every nattering nabob of negativity climbed on board to defeat the evil proposal to build a park, but the only Seattle institution saved by their opposition was the civic fear of conspiracies.

That this civic fear is alive and well was illustrated recently by several blogposts suggesting Gregoire had wickedly promised improved bus service and was now reneging, and in the most recent form, by a post at Seattle Transit Blog suggesting that a central waterfront park in Seattle could be too big.

In the case of Gregoire and the buses, let’s remember that Ron Sims promised Gregoire that King County would supply bus transit for commuters to downtown, and, depending on that promise, Gregoire announced a downscaled effort by the state to provide capacity for traffic bypassing downtown. Now Sims is off to the other Washington, to spread his pro-bus-anti-rail agenda, and Gregoire is left to deal with Frank Chopp and his merry band.

It hardly seems any more realistic to imagine a waterfront park that is "too large" in an area that even a wheezing asthmatic can traverse on foot in about three minutes. But this is hardly the last dark foreboding that will emerge in the Seattle Process, and commenting on them often bears more resemblance to a game of whack-a-mole than reasoned discourse. Informed observers will have noted that John Fox is back, now fighting increased density around rail transit stations, as part of his tireless but ineffective demagoguery for low-income housing.

Enough already! The next time you feel like they’re all out to get you, grab some old issues of the Helix and find out what real conspiracies look like. Conspiracies? We had ‘em. But now, not so much.

Kemper Copter

When we last left Bellevue real-estate developer Kemper Freeman, he was telling us that we didn’t need light rail to Bellevue, our highways and buses were just fine, thanks!

Now we learn that Freeman’s company is looking to make use of a helipad on top of Bellvue Square that’s been sitting dormant for 20 years. The reason for the increased interest in helicopter travel won’t surprise you:

The Freeman family, which controls Kemper and built Bellevue Place, Bellevue Square and Lincoln Square, has a longstanding interest in helicopters, Hill says, and it figured the pad might be useful someday.

It’s been used twice, he says, and the time seems right to prepare for more frequent use. Kemper is seeking a permit to allow up to three takeoffs and three landings daily, and up to 200 of each per year.

Why gear up for regular operations now? Because, with traffic getting worse, the helistop will provide another way to get in and out of downtown Bellevue for at least a few people, Hill says. Plus it’s an amenity that could appeal to some prospective office tenants.

In other words, Freeman does believe in the effectiveness of grade-separated transit, but only for him and his rich buddies. Everyone else should be forced to sit in traffic.

If I were Bellevue, I’d offer Freeman and his company a deal: you can have your helipad, in exchange for, oh, say… $1 billion to build a light rail tunnel under your mall.

Fantasies of a Dilettante Grocer

I see the old Dilettante Chocolate space on 23rd and Cherry is available for rent, at a very reasonable price!   In some alternative universe, I’d love to buy it and open up a sweet Jane Jacobs-inspired corner grocery store there.  

Alas, I know nothing about the corner grocery business (except for what stories I heard about my grandfather’s corner store back in New York), and I’d imagine the regulations and such involved are pretty foreboding.  

Perhaps some other dilettante will read this post and be inspired to give it a shot.

Infrastructure Banks

 I agree with Andrew that a national infrastructure bank would be a good idea.  President Obama’s mentioned it on several occasions, but I believe the idea goes back to the 2007 Dodd-Hagel bill to create such an entity.  Also see this prescient Bob Herbert column from just over a year ago.

Ideally, the bank would have two qualities: (1) it would be able to lend directly to agencies, instead of having to filter the money through state governments where potential shenanigans could occur, and (2) the formulas used for calculating the funds would take into account the impacts of transit-oriented development, land use patterns, have a long-term time horizon, etc.  

New ST Bus Service

 Press release here.  Lots of good stuff.  Heartening to see a transit agency adding service while so many others are shriveling up and cutting back.

Note that these are not the planned ST2 improvements, those will come in the spring.

Gregoire the Used Car Saleswoman

I really hate to be so crass but I’m calling it how I see it. Just as I started to warm up to the tunnel Gregoire shows her real priorities. She played Ron Sims and now there is very little reason for greens to support this solution. This was the last thing holding many on and it will be interesting to see how the tunnel fairs in the next few weeks.

I had a ton of questions about the deep bore tunnel and now I think a lot of people are going to take a hard look to see if this is the best solution, especially now that more bus service isn’t hanging over their heads.

For example look at the finances. The port has yet to pitch in 300 million (btw they are hurting right now, with container volumes down ~30 percent from last year). WSDOT has a funding deficit of 400 million (which looks like it can only be solved with tolls). And that is chump change compared to the roughly 1 billion that the city needs to raise. I’d like to see how much of an appetite there is for raising that kind of money when the state has a nearly 6 billion dollar deficit and as thousands of Boeing, WAMU, Starbucks, and Microsoft employees are getting laid off.

Despite the grand rhetoric I think there are at least a few more twists and turns down the road.

The Senate Steps Up

Sens. Murray and Schumer, among others, are offering bills to increase the amount of transit funding in the Senate version of the stimulus bill.  

While this is all well and good, if we’re going to be investing extra billions in transit during the stimulus, what I want to know is (a) is the money going to states or directly to transit agencies, and (b) is it according to existing formulas or new formulas that take into account transit-oriented development.  I’d rather wait and spend smartly six months from now than just dump money now. 

Sadly, I’m swamped with work right now and I can’t properly research the answers to these questions.