Seattle Bicycle Freeway

Seattle Bicycle Freeway

In our attempt at making cities more friendly for bicycling, we often talk of bike paths as being the gold standard.  But cars never settled for paths – riddled with stop lights, crosswalks, and pedestrians – for their ideal commute.  I think it’s time to consider a bicycle freeway downtown.

My idea of a bicycle freeway would be an 8′ wide ribbon of concrete placed around 15′ in the air over a sidewalk.  There would be a simple railing on both sides, and would look a bit like a pedestrian overpass.  The bicycle freeway would allow bicyclists to speed past street-level obstacles and quickly enter the heart of the city.  Exit ramps would be curved and would be roughly level, which would be accomplished by exiting in the uphill direction (thanks to downtown’s hilly nature). 

Additional benefits would include a bit of shading and rain protection for pedestrians below, and the potential for hill leveling to allow for an easier ride.

 (please excuse the low-quality MS Paint rendering)

red tube x videos x hamster

Dr. Transit and Mr. Ferry

An alarming thing can happen to a mild-mannered transit advocate when they hear the word ‘ferry’. Suddenly they go all Robert Moses on you, demanding superferries, super terminals, and super highways to encourage sprawl on the west side of Puget Sound. As for what the locals may think of all this, why, they must not be allowed to stand in the way of this vital economic development of our historic destiny, and so forth and so on.

Things get even worse when the subject is the passenger-only ferry (POF). The mild dislike that tempers enthusiasm for the car ferry is cast aside, along with every truism of responsible development of transit. Now we’re assured that the new boats (this discussion never involves the old boats that actually did the job quite well) will be fast and, if that’s not enough, modern.

In vain to point out that there are established passenger services on the ferries connecting to well-planned bus connections serving existing communities. That kind of old-fashioned thinking might serve to justify spending $100 million taking transit right into Bellevue, but is quite unsuited for thinking about POFs, which could open new parts of the West Sound to development. You might think that future Westsounders would locate near existing transit if it was light rail, but imagining they might locate to ride as passengers on a car ferry, as so many do already, is quite impossible.

By now our former Dr Transit, now Mr Ferry, usually has a full head of steam, and launches into a florid and mildly delusional description of the trips they might take, once or twice a year, if only a POF served those routes. Yes, it would be romantic, but, for that matter, a long bus trip is also romantic, if you only do it once or twice a year.

At this point, there is no Dr Transit- it’s all Mr Ferry. Bleeding Kitsap’s transit budget with money-losing ferry routes becomes a good thing, sprawl becomes ‘development’, and the rider of the POF should thank their lucky stars that they can now pay three times as much for their journey, because it’s fast and modern.

Are you a Dr Transit, or a Mr Ferry? Before you answer, grab a copy of Gordon Newall’s Ships of the Inland Sea and spend a weekend meeting the way-it-was. For a very moderate price you can spend a few hours of that on the Bremerton boat, with tasty snacks and a sculpture park in Bremerton making a layover there worthwhile. Mix what you learn with modern principles of public transit, and top it off with a look at the Staten Island ferry.

New York could have built their modern boats in a different shape, but chose to maintain their heritage. There’s a lesson in there, someplace.

red tube x videos x hamster

Drive to Work Day 2010

So Drive to Work Day is coming up on April 1. While we could do the same old drive to our own workplaces, to go along with the custom Link signs we could also:

  • to highlight East Link, get up early and fill South Bellevue and Mercer Island park and rides with Zipcars, then all drive into downtown Seattle at about 9am
  • use the SR-520/I-5 interchange as much as possible
  • just drive around on congested arterials

We could even apparently park wherever we want and ignore the tickets. I also thought of filling the Viaduct to capacity but that seemed unwise.

red tube x videos x hamster

Mercer Island Link

View Larger Map

Martin’s post about Mercer Island link reminds me how under-appreciated (at least by me!) Mercer Island’s light rail stop is. Two stops in one direction to downtown Seattle, two stops in the other direction to (or somewhat in the vicinity of) downtown Bellevue.

Mercer Island is primarily suburban, of course, but there are some good TOD opportunities around the station on the north end (see the above map). Now, Mercer Island’s legislators aren’t known for their benevolence, but it would seem smart to add some more housing around the station.

red tube x videos x hamster

Unbuilding Last Century’s Megaprojects

I’m a fan of tearing down the Viaduct, think we should downscale our ferry terminal, and believe we should get rid of 520 as well.  Just as road capacity creates sprawl, reducing capacity builds density.  It will be painful at first, as people increase their commute times until they decide to move near their job, but the end result will be beautiful.  Knute Berger recently wrote up a great article on this topic: Mayor, tear down that bridge.

red tube x videos x hamster
Future of Seattle Ferries

Future of Seattle Ferries

Ferry TerminalApropos of nothing, let’s consider how car ferries impact Seattle’s waterfront.  Even in a car-based world it makes little sense to put such a large source of cars right in the middle of the city.  In such a world it’s a bit of a stretch to think of a far-west sider driving on to a ferry to drive and park in Seattle.  But Seattle is quickly changing into a foot-based city, which brings this situation from inefficient to absurd.

How many car-ferry based trips either start or end in the city?  I’d guess very few.  This means cars get off in Seattle and drive through city streets to get to freeways.  That’s not efficient for the cars, and certainly isn’t efficient or attractive for either the pedestrians or the drivers on our streets.

Imagine for a minute our new transformed, viaductless waterfront.  The one choke point and large waste of space I can see is the ferry terminal.  Imagine if instead of a vast stretch of parking lot we had a boardwalk space similar to San Francisco’s Pier 39 with tiny retail stores, restaurants, and common areas for entertainment and picknicking.

We’d keep ferries coming and going of course, they’d just be foot ferries – far less expensive to maintain and run.  We’d also keep a path open for car ferries by running more to West Seattle and Edmonds, or pick somewhere else out of the way.

red tube x videos x hamster

What Would Carey Bozeman Say?

In a sense, Sound Transit delivered itself bound hand and foot to the Bellevue City Council, when it betrayed its eagerness to stop in downtown Bellevue. In making their desire so manifest, ST opened the door to demagoguing politicians, who could campaign against a downtown location, or demand expensive tunneling, without paying the price of not getting any station at all.

And lo, so it came to pass, that some total nincompoops were elected to the City Council on this platform. Now four of the Bellevue councilmembers, and the mayor, display an incoherence bordering on imbecility- and betraying the sound judgment displayed for years by Bellevue.

For years Bellevue held high-density development in the center, and preserved the Bel-Red Corridor for future development. All seemed to be working together to connect transit, riders, and jobs and commerce, all to the greater glory of Bellevue.

Now, four councilmembers propose to shift the center of the city eastward, in effect, of the freeway. This is not impossible, in fact, it makes a lot of sense- but not from the perspective of landowners in the current core. Why do they put up with it? Is it a careful plan we don’t understand, or a simple smash-and-grab by newly elected demagogues?

In pondering this matter, I remembered that Carey Bozeman was the mayor of Bellevue when sanity emerged and the city of Bellevue began to stand erect, literally rising from the sludge of sprawl it had become. And Carey Bozeman was also the mayor of Bremerton when that city began to turn itself around after hitting rock bottom at the end of the 20th century. Perhaps Mr. Bozeman could shed some light on the thought processes behind what we’re seeing.

Or perhaps, with time and the river flowing, events will sort themselves out before we understand them. But I’m pretty sure it was a mistake for ST to give Bellevue a veto in this situation. It was simply an invitation to a form of abuse that has now occurred.

red tube x videos x hamster

Feet First Maps

I’m taking my son and niece on the light rail to find parks today, and found this resource.  It has walking maps of all of the Rainier Valley light rail stations.  It looks like it’s been around a while and people around here may already know about it, but I hadn’t so I thought I’d share.

red tube x videos x hamster

News, Money, and Ethics

The Seattle Times has been running a full court press to build 520 in any way the state (and Microsoft) wants.  It’s always felt to me that money drives news in our local papers (now paper), but with Microsoft paying $40,000 for a full page ad supporting the bridge it’s not even being done under the table.  I don’t blame Microsoft for this – $40k is a great deal if it helps them get their multi-billion dollar road subsidy.  When credible news sources have a conflict of interest, I at least usually hear a disclaimer in the story – not so with the Seattle Times.  Should newspapers be ethically bound to drop or at least moderate stories that directly benefit them?

red tube x videos x hamster

A Wistful Daydream

In a sense it’s a darned shame the transit to the eastside is moving so fast. In a short time (as these things go) public opinion would support twice as much transit for the same money.

This seeming miracle, of course, would be accomplished by using the land and right-of-way the public already owns. There’s no question that that land has been vetted for public transportation, and surely the environmental studies could largely re-use the work that was previously done.

Imagine, if you will, a line running east from Ballard to
Redmond over the Evergreen Point bridge, and another running east from the ID to Issaquah- the two intersected by a belt line on the old BNSF Renton to Woodinville line.

This leaves Bellevue west of the line, but, not to worry, Bellevue will shift east if this line were built, as witness this recent article in the Seattle P-I. Similarly, in Kirkland and further north are large parcels, formerly served by the rail line, and held by investors waiting to see what happens.

By this point some STB readers will be blowing their safety valves. Don’t worry- the chances that building the line would involve using a route where all the major earthmoving had already been done are about zero. You’ll get your massively expanded Park ‘n Ride on the Mercer Slough. And, as with almost every transit system in the world, the currently proposed line will stand forever as a visible-from-space testimonial to the power of deal-making.

red tube x videos x hamster